The Publication Process of the International Journal of Emerging Knowledge Studies typically follows a systematic procedure designed to ensure the quality and integrity of published research. Based on the diagram provided earlier, here’s a breakdown of the common stages in the publication process for this journal:

1. Submission

• The author submits the manuscript through the journal’s online submission system.

2. Initial Editorial Review

• The editor assesses whether the manuscript fits the journal’s scope and quality standards.
• If unsuitable, the manuscript is rejected at this stage.
• If revisions are required, the manuscript is sent back to the author for minor adjustments before it moves to the next stage.

3. Acceptance for Processing

• Once the editor is satisfied, the manuscript is accepted for processing and sent for peer review. At this point, it moves to the reviewer stage.

4. Peer Review

• Reviewers (often experts in the field) provide detailed feedback on the manuscript’s methodology, relevance, originality, and quality.
• Based on the reviewer comments, the editor decides whether to:
  • Reject the manuscript if it does not meet the necessary standards.
  • Request revisions from the author (either minor or major) based on the reviewers’ suggestions.

5. Revision

• The author revises the manuscript as per the reviewers’ comments and submits the revised version.
• The revised manuscript is evaluated by the editor, who may:
  • Accept the revisions and proceed.
  • Send the revised manuscript back to the reviewers for further evaluation (if the changes are substantial).
  • Reject the manuscript if the revisions are inadequate or unsatisfactory.

6. Acceptance

• After the editor and reviewers are satisfied with the revisions, the manuscript is accepted for publication.

7. Galley Proof

• The author receives the galley proof of the manuscript, which is a final version before publication.
• This is the last opportunity to check for any typographical errors or minor issues.

8. Publication

• Once the galley proof is approved, the manuscript is published in the journal and made available online.

Rejection Points:

• Initial rejection: Based on the editor’s assessment of scope and quality.
• Rejection after review: Based on peer review feedback.
• Rejection after revision: If the author’s revisions do not meet expectations.

This structured process ensures that all submissions undergo rigorous evaluation, maintaining the quality and relevance of the journal’s publications.